TBD
To Win
N. Jarry
To Win
Nicolas Jarry vs Mate Pavic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L L L
Form
L W L L W L L W W LHead To Head: Jarry 1 - 0 Pavic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jarry winning 2 and Pavic winning 0. The last match between Jarry and Pavic was at the Puebla Challenger, 05-03-2016, Q1 round, I.hard with Nicolas Jarry getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(0).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | 1 |
| Mate Pavic | 0 |
Puebla Challenger(05-03-2016)
7
6
7
6
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Jarry
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Moller VS Basavareddy PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(0) |
Stats 
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Mate Pavic
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
14
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
38 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
17 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:37:50 | Average Match Time | 1:37:50 |
| 59% (50/85) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
| 80% (40/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 90% (38/42) |
| 54% (19/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 26% (17/66) | Return Points Win % | 31% (26/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nicolas Jarry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Nicolas Jarry
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
4
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Nicolas Jarry
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Nicolas Jarry
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Jarry
61%
(
73 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
48 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
36 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Nicolas Jarry
63%
(
80 of
128)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
108)
12
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
53 of
66)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
26 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Nicolas Jarry
67%
(
76 of
114)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(10) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Nicolas Jarry
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
23 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
111
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Nicolas Jarry
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
10
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
10
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mate Pavic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Mate Pavic
47%
(
9 of
19)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
26
Total Points Won
10
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mate Pavic
Player
Zihao Xia
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
14
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mate Pavic
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Mate Pavic
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Mate Pavic
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
14
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
38 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
17 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Mate Pavic
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (398/277) | Win/Loss | 51% (140/135) |
| 57% (931/697) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (327/317) |
| 52% (8583/7781) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3112/3097) |
| 51% (79/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (64/37) |
| 64% (297/166) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (39/56) |
| 34% (11/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39% (22/34) |
| 42% (11/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) |
| 0.59 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 4725 | Aces Total | 855 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1523 | Total Double Faults | 313 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 642.19 |
| 63% (27490/43536) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5520/8493) |
| 75% (20562/27490) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3830/5520) |
| 54% (8604/16046) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1370/2973) |
| 38% (1338/3512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (280/690) |
| 36% (15911/44662) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3074/8419) |
| 49% (25/26) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (23/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (15/14) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (91/77) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (27/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (163/99) | Challenger W/L | 40% (26/39) |
| 71% (81/33) | Futures W/L | 60% (87/59) |
| 60% (380/632) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (137/271) |
| 38% (14/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (189/360) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (60/113) |
| 50% (112/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (48/98) |
| 85% (390/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (148/119) |
| 15% (390/58) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (148/29) |
| 23% (285/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (127/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
